âŠwith what? We donât know anything with which to spoil!
1 Like
Iâve always been able to do it for the previous movies.
Much like EVERYTHING that is immediately said about Psycho is a spoiler if you watch the film. The shower scene, the mother and Norman Bates are all HUGE plot twists, but anyone who seeâs that film now knew All that before hand.
1 Like
Iâm sure none of our members is intentionally aiming at spoiling the BOND 25 experience for others. As I already said above, the mere fact of speculative discussion on here will by default be hit and miss. More often miss - but once or twice hit. Where to draw the line?
Somewhere in the datafoam that constitutes this thread I expressed a wish about how to possibly conceive the angle of Bondâs relationship status more interesting. Weeks later it could - or maybe not - turn out to be true. And might be considered - perhaps - a spoiler insofar as people who want to go entirely blank into BOND 25 wouldnât want to know about it.
Something like this doesnât happen intentionally. But thereâs also no way how we could prevent it, given our raison dâĂȘtre is to discuss Bond. And here news on BOND 25 in particular.
4 Likes
Beauty.
1 Like
Yes and no. Theyâve cast two new Bond girls for this movie, logic dictates Bond will sleep with at least one of them. Thatâs a precedent thatâs never been broken.
I generally would agree with you, but itâs the publicized return of Madeline that throws a wrench into this. Given that we have been told by EON numerous times that Madeline is returning, the claim that Craig and a different Bond girl are having a sex coach can be more spoilerific than it would have been in basically any other circumstance.
That being said, Iâm not too worked up about this particular spoiler. I just think that if members feel comfortable posting it on this thread (given what we know about Seydoux 's return), then I am a bit nervous that bigger spoilers may find their way here as well.
Told by the Daily Mail, a paper that have had to make several public apologies for more serious lies than this would be.
1 Like
Or both at the same time 
Naughty.
Frankly, if anything wouldnât the spoiler be Seydouxâs return, rather than a supposed hiring of a coach?
1 Like
Craig having surgery.
3 Likes
He must be pretty pissed off.
I think this depends on the particular sensitivities of the individual trying to remain spoiler free. Personally (and I can only speak for myself), Iâm basically okay with anything EON themselves feed us-- press releases, the Jamaica filming launch event, trailers, and TV spots. So Iâm okay with cast and locations and EONâs official synopsis. Beyond that, things can get a little dicey.
But I recognize that others may be more or less sensitive to spoilers than I am.
2 Likes
I imagine the Universal âmove for more moneyâ acts as a nice safety net for that.
That sucks.
1 Like
For the more recent instances of filming commencing without a title, does anyone recall approximately when the title was announced in either case? QOS was the most recent IIRC, with DAD & I think TND previously.
Quantum of Solace was confirmed on 24th Jan 2008 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7206997.stm
1 Like
The title for Die Another Day was announced on March 12th 2002, with principal shooting starting on January 11th 2002. Minor scenes like the Korea surfing scenes were already shot in December 2011 (was the first news item I ever read on CBn).
1 Like