What Movie Have You Seen Today?

Play Dirty (Amazon Prime)

I enjoy Shane Black’s work as a writer/director (“Kiss Kiss Bang Bang”, “The Nice Guys”), and his new movie, an adaptation of Donald E. Westlake´s “Parker”-novels, has the disadvantage of being just an Amazon Prime movie and earning many lukewarm to bad reviews.

I, however, loved this typical Shane Black mix of hard boiled crime and comedy, changing and mixing moods like, well, real life. And despite my lack of love for Mark Wahlberg I am happy to say he delivers a fantastic performance in this one, totally on point, tough, cool, funny.

And Black not only can direct actors perfectly, he also always excels in action sequences which are captivating and humorous at the same time. There are at least two breathtaking ones during which I thought “if only Shane Black was given a Bond film, he could nail the tone I want so well”. (Funnily, there is a title sequence which riffs on SKYFALL here.) And Alan Silvestri´s score is wonderful, too, the kind of melodic driving force movies could always rely on in the 70´s and 80´s.

Highly recommended.

7 Likes

New York Film Festival Update #1

It has been a lively festival so far, and your faithful correspondent has been busy sitting and watching. All the movies so far have been engaging, and some were amazing.

AFTER THE HUNT (Luca Guadagnino) – Opening Night selection, and the weakest film so far. Performances are fine, the mise en scene precise and chilly, but the script tries to do too much, and have it too many ways. The withholding of information, and multiple possible motives/explanations presented are supposed to cultivate ambiguity, and they do–for a while (about three-quarters of the movie). But the film eventually collapses under the weight of its own indecision. Julia Roberts is fantastic in a role where she does not rely on her cinematic charm, but goes deeper, and masks her usual likeability.

PETER HUJAR’S DAY (Ira Sachs)–The simplest of premises: Sachs uses rediscovered transcripts from an unused 1974 interview between Linda Rosenkrantz (Rebecca Hall) and Peter Hujar (Ben Whishaw), where Hujar narrates the events of the previous day in minute detail. But what is so simple in conception is richly superb in realization, as Sachs turns what was a 90-minute conversation across a table into a kaleidoscopic morning-into-afternoon-into-evening chronicle of queer New York City in the 1970s–capturing (in Sachs’ words) all that has been last, and all that remains. Whishaw and Hall are excellent. The film’s 76 minutes contain multitudes.

SECRET AGENT (Kleber Mendonça Filho)–A film about Brazil in the 1970s and the dictatorship that ruled the country, Mendonça provides a sharp depiction of life under tyranny, and methods of resistance. Wagner Moura is great as an ordinary research scientist turned by circumstance into an activist and fugitive. A great chronicle of life under oppression.

THE MASTERMIND (Kelly Reichardt)–Another 1970s film (seems to be a theme of the early part of the festival), Reichardt tells the tale of a modest art museum heist that goes very wrong. In the talkback, she said that she sees the film as an unwinding, and as the narrative unfolds/becomes undone, the surface of 1970s America unwinds, revealing the rot underneath. As with FIRST COW and SHOWING UP, the penultimate sequence brings everything together in the most powerful way possible. Reichardt is one the most interesting directors around in terms of narrative/cinematic structure.

LATE FAME (Kent Jones)–A winning trifle based on the Schnitzler novella, LATE FAME is a love letter to New York City (1970s again), and a raised eyebrow to its present. William Dafoe and Greta Lee are outstanding, and more than worth the price of admission.

ANEMONE (Ronan Day-Lewis)–It pays to be the son of Daniel Day-Lewis. R. Day-Lewis is a painter, and his first feature is very painterly, with compositions that are rich and compelling. Father and son developed the script over fours years, and it shows. D. Day Lewis’ performance reminds us what has been missing from the screen these last eight years. His monologues are some of the most powerful I have ever seen on screen. But those years of work also throw the film into imbalance: as good as the other actors are, they cannot compete with D. Day-Lewis’s talent, and having lived with the role for so long.

A HOUSE OF DYNAMITE (Kathryn Bigelow)–Bigelow’s return to the screen, and a tidy and timely thriller. A nuclear missle is launched at the United States from persons/county unknown. There are 18 minutes to respond. Bigelow goes over those 18 minutes three times from different perspectives, which astonishingly, increases the suspense rather then dilute it–the third sequences is the tensest of all. The acting from an impressive cast is superb.

BLUE MOON (Richard Linklater)–Lorenz Hart at Sardi’s for the opening night party of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s “Oklahoma!” A superb script, with a phenomenal Ethan Hawke as Hart, and great support from Andrew Scott (Richard Rodgers) and Bobby Canavale (the bartender we all wish was our friend). Played out in real time, the film is an amazing amalgam of writing, acting, and mise en scene. Linklater’s hand is light, but firm, as he guides us through the evening, and the rollercoaster emotions of Lorenz Hart.

JAY KELLY (Noah Baumbach)–During then Q&A, Baumbach said that when George Clooney accepted the role, he told him that Baumbach was lucky Clooney said yet, since there were only three actors in the world who could play the role. And he was right. Clooney is magnificent, and matched/supported by Adam Sandler and Laura Dern. I have never enjoyed a Baumbach film this much, which may be attributable to the hand that Emily Mortimer had in the script. There is an openness and compassion here that is missing for me in his earlier films.

NOUVELLE VAGUE (Richard Linklater)–the second Linklater film of the Festival, this film tells the story of the making of BREATHLESS. In his film debut, Guillaume Marbeck is Jean-Luc Godard–or Godard as I imagine him to be (only saw him once in person at the festival, when he brought PASSION to be screened). It helps if you know the cinema landscape of the time, but even without that knowledge, the film is a black-and-white treat, showing how great art arises from artists going their own resolute way.

SENTIMENTAL VALUE (Joachim Trier)–Trier’s latest film (following 2021’s THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD), finds the director dexterously and exquisitely exploring the conflicted ways of an absent father his daughters (hello JAY KELLY). The father is an auteur filmmaker (Stellan Skarsgard), and one of his daughters is an accomplished stage actress (Renate Reinsve), and the other a therapist (Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas). Again, the script is wonderful, and the acting superb. The gentle, tentative reconciliation that closes the film feels true in the deepest ways.

I know that my precis may seem repetitive, but at all the talkbacks, the actors have spoken of the strength of the scripts, and the films so far have shined in the areas of writing and acting. They are also well-directed, but the visuals have not asserted themselves over the writing or performance (save for ANEMONE). I can recommend all these films as fine cinematic adventures to be savored and enjoyed.

3 Likes

No fan of Westlake wants or needs a crime comedy adaption of a Parker novel…

I do.

But why? Isn´t there already enough crime comedy without ruining the work of Westlake?

Why is it ruining it? The books exist no matter what a movie adaptation makes of them.

And „Play Dirty“ is definitely having its share of Westlake-ian darkness and grittiness. Black just highlights the absurd humour already existing in it.

1 Like

Watched Ballerina finally. Surprisingly dull until a fun fight near the end. Kind of bummed about this one.

3 Likes

One Battle After Another (2025). Enjoyable, but I feel that PTA has done better. Leo felt on autopilot with his performance, we’ve seen him do the same thing before. Chase Infiniti is a talent to keep an eye on. Benicio del Toro is a joy to watch, as he’s got a charm to him in this part. I do think that Sean Penn is one of the better movie villains in recent memory. Overall, a fun movie, but I still like Punch-Drunk Love (2002) better. PTA doesn’t make the same movie over and over again. It’s something different every time. OBAA happily continues that streak.

1 Like

Thunderfoot and Lightfoot (1974). A great buddy movie. It further proves that Michael Cimino arguably had a lot of talent that got lost in his ego, sadly. George Kennedy’s bad guy role here isn’t talked about as much as it should be. An underrated movie villain, I’d say. And can we all agree that Jeff Bridges is charming, and could have deserved that Oscar? All in all, a great movie to watch with your friends.

6 Likes

Because Parker is not funny in the books…not once. So if you make a funny movie with a wisecracking Mark Wahlberg called Play Dirty, make it without the Parker Character. Mel Gibson had the decency to call his character Porter, and his film is like a Shakespeare adaption to this crap. And lets not talk about the very bad CGI action scenes. Could not force myself to watch the whole movie

1 Like

Try it to inform your opinion on the movie.

I did not get the feeling that Wahlberg was wisecracking around. Also, I did not see “very bad CGI”.

Of course, not everything is for everyone. I don’t like a lot of stuff which is available either.

1 Like

Sorry, but I´m just too old and don´t have enough time left to watch stuff I don´t like after 30 minutes :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:. And for example the horses were really bad, they bounced around like rubberballs…I´m so picky about this film because i love the Parker novels and just like with Dirk Pitt or Travis McGee we fans weren´t bombarded and swamped with good adaptions so it just makes me sad when another mediocre to bad one comes around the corner

2 Likes

Have to confess these days I mostly share the sentiment. So much of what is produced currently feels as if it just isn’t aimed at me. Wasn’t there another Wahlberg vehicle recently, a Spenser adaptation? I liked many of the original PI novels by Robert B Parker - but the trailer didn’t intrigue me at all, the source was some ‘continuation’ (and we know what a mixed bag that can be), so I didn’t invest lifetime in this.

When it’s obvious a new release isn’t meant to show what I’m usually looking for - visually, character- or storywise - then I only give it a try if I’m a) massively intrigued (against better judgement) or b) bored to death in a place I cannot escape from.

5 Likes

Watched “Vendetta For The Saint” because… well.. it is 14 October, the day of Roger’s birth.
I love this tv movie, in the beginning of the eighies my dad taped this from Dutch television with one of these early huge vcr’s which you could buy way before VHS, V2000 and BetaMax. Everytime I visited him I wanted to watch this movie.
It is also fun to see that almost none of the actors are realy Italian, maybe only that long thin guy, but the rest are English guys, even a young Steven Berkoff is one of them.

6 Likes

THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER (McTiernan, 1990)

Is it fair to call this THE benchmark submarine thriller? Absolutely. The subgenre has several decent entries - but none come to mind doing a better job in balancing fact and fiction, ballistics and bullshit so entertainingly. This film is doing many things right, depicting the art of naval/submarine warfare just authentic enough to keep audiences intrigued while not going too deep into technical or political detail to bore them.

I still think the source novel, along with The Cardinal of the Kremlin, belongs to Clancy’s better works and is way more gripping than most of his later doorstops. That said, I read it around 88/89 and cannot exactly trace all the film’s deviations. Suffice it to say the plot and spirit of the book remain largely intact.

Connery as Lithuanian/Soviet attack submarine captain with Scottish accent is a stretch - but great fun nonetheless and hugely aided by Neill’s Borodin. Baldwin - to me - is still the best Jack Ryan and Scott Glenn could probably have walked into any US Navy base and commandeered any vessel he liked back then based on this small but important part.

Also worth noting, the film plays a shade over two hours and there’s no slack in it. There is some action, but it’s largely naval ops, sub models and sound effects. And: this film was made a year after LICENCE TO KILL, with $ 2m less budget and most submarine interiors rebuilt on the soundstage on hydraulic platforms to simulate submerging ops. But it easily looks like twice the budget and much more impressive than the Bond film.

Among certain fans there’s long been the rumour the most expensive prop had supposedly been Jane’s Fighting Ships and that Clancy himself has lend his private copy to the production. While that is almost certainly nonsense it’s at least amusingly made up and illustrates the standing of this film amongst nerds. You could probably remake this with a $ 500m budget and Pentagon support for another half billion - but the result wouldn’t look one jot more authentic or entertaining.

10 Likes

The Life of Chuck

Mike Flanagan once again proves to be on the same wavelength as Stephen King, adapting his novella superbly by evoking the atmosphere and making the characters alive as vividly on film as King did in his prose.

„The Life of Chuck“ therefore radiates with charme, intelligence, emotion and melancholia, giving us a glimpse into life and death and its connection, establishing meaning where it is so sad to find, and still emphasizing the hope and happiness we crave.

One of the best films of the year, and naturally, audiences rather chose a „Jurassic Park“ sequel.

Avant l‘hiver

This perfect drama from Philippe Claudel is one of those films which revel in subtlety, telling a compelling story with a precision that is so hard to attain, never drowning in melodrama or cynicism as so many films do. It is the tale of a neurosurgeon (one of the greatest actors ever, Daniel Auteuil) who believes a young woman he operated on many years ago has become his stalker. But the idea of starting a new life with her because the old one increasingly feels like a mistake, a wrong turn taken when he was too young to know, begins to make him feel alive again.

However, he is not interested in an affair or any sexual exchange, he just wants to help her. And the reason this confuses the young woman is one of the most shocking twists I have ever seen.

A truly magnificent film.

4 Likes

Logan Lucky (2017 Steven Soderbergh film starring Channing Tatum, Adam Driver and Daniel Craig): The southern accents were debatable, and some of the stereotypes became a bit grating, but the plot (right up to hiding the proceeds of the robbery in a landfill) made for a fun nod to the Ocean’s Eleven films.

It was interesting to me that Soderbergh completely bypassed the studios to make this film. Even though the film was a disappointment at the box office, I wonder if he still made a profit, since he basically sold everything except the cinema showings.

5 Likes

As a native US Southerner (I live outside of Atlanta, GA) I can’t stand overdone Southern accents most of the time. But the ones in Lucky Logan are so over the top in service to a parody, that I found them hilarious, especially Craig’s.

5 Likes

Fair enough. I figured the accents were satirical, but it reached a point where I found them a bit grating. And yes, Craig’s was especially over the top!

1 Like

The Parallax View.

A movie with no easy answers and an abundance of tension. Definitely leaves you on a note that demands some thought well after the credits are done.

5 Likes