last movie which i seen it’s “Wolf from wall street”, and this film inspired me for interest to poker, and i start playng on this game from smartphone, but first i read http://onlinepokerrooms-reviews.com/ for better choise of service
I saw the 4k restoration of Bertolucci’s NOVECENTO in two parts as Bertolucci intended. When the first half ended, I would not have minded staying for the second–a rare experience. But the interval of a day was good, since the second half is different in subtle ways from the first (though clearly they are two parts of the same film), and the anticipation was pleasant.
This screening was also the first time I had seen the film in the Italian dub, and it is the best dubbing I have ever seen/heard. Even with such familiar voices–Sterling Hayden, Burt Lancaster, Robert DeNiro, Gerard Depardieu–I was not distracted. The voices were wonderfully directed and worked well with the images. The film coheres for me more than it ever did before, and seems like his greatest work before he jumps into the deep end of filmic prettiness. THE LAST EMPEROR now looks like a re-use of NOVECENTO’s themes in a different setting—Pu YI is another Alfredo—both ridiculous men (as Bertolucci’s male protagonists often are). The film feels like Bertolucci wanted both to pay homage to and at the same time to deepen the work of Rossellini, DeSica and Visconti—a neo-realist melodrama.
I am not sure how far-and-wide the movie might play—it only got a week’s run in NYC—but since it is a Paramount restoration effort, there may be a blu ray release of it.
“They Shall Not Grow Old.” Brilliant WWI documentary from Peter Jackson using modern film making technology for good instead of evil :-), restoring historic footage to amazing clarity and even looping in sound, right down to dialog reconstructed by lip-readers (!). It’s like you’re really there in 1918 (or judging by the dental hygiene on view, maybe even 1618).
Amusingly, one of the most striking aspects of the whole thing was the average British soldier’s obsession with tea. I lost count of how many times someone mentioned making it or craving it, going so far as to boil brackish, corpse-contaminated foxhole water to make a pot of it, or pilfering hot water from Vicker’s machine guns (!) or locomotive engines. And once the war’s over, the pleasure of being treated to a cup back home.
Interesting that Fleming goes out of his way to reinforce Bond’s antipathy towards the stuff. Must have been a radical notion at the time; even for a culture that celebrates eccentricity, a British hero who hates tea borders on TOO eccentric.
I recommend the film to anyone with even a passing interest in history, or film restoration. Out of all the previews I saw, its interesting the only one I was really keen on was the “Apollo 11” documentary. Not sure what it says about me that I’m suddenly so in to historical docs, but I have a sneaking suspicion it has something to do with age.
A kind of sci-fi/western mash up.
Plenty of movies have failed at such a mash up, but with it’s low budget demanding creative thinking the filmmakers get it right.
Great pace, great idea, good script and very good performances all round. Pedro Pascal once again proves what a superb screen presence he is. Would make a fine Bond villain and an interesting Bond.
A Star is Born
Quite different from what I’ve expected. Great first act, solid but predictable ending and perhaps too literal in between. Fantastic acting; all the Oscar nominated are well deserved. Especially Sam Elliott, who in some small scenes is absolutely fantastic. Shallow is a perfect song, I must admit. Not as good as I hoped it would be but still worth watching.
He’s a great screen presence and always delivers in supporting roles, or ensembles such as the excellent 1993 movie Tombstone and in ‘guest appearances’ such as The Big Lebowski.
But for a full-on Elliot starring role check out the new movie ‘The man who killed Hitler and then Bigfoot’
Don’t let the title put you off, it’s honestly a great little thriller about the menace of two very different monsters. The ‘what if’ plot is delivered straight faced by Sam Elliot and the rest of the cast. It’s very entertaining and well paced.
It also gives you a chance to see Bond 7 candidate Aidan Turner playing a younger Sam Elliot; a deadly, focused WW2 assassin. It makes a fairly decent show of his Bond chops.
Thanks @odd_jobbies, I’ve never heard of it but definitely I’ll give it a try. Great title, by the way .
The demands foisted on this movie are not unlike those placed on Carol Danvers herself in this 21st entry of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Can she help the Avengers defeat Thanos? Is the movie a beacon for feminism? Does it set the table for Endgame? Is it a social comment on misogyny and sexism for today’s world? The expectations for it were raised by Marvel’s own cultural phenomenon and financial success with Black Panther and DC beating them to the feminist superhero punch with Wonder Woman. There’s nothing supremely controversial about it other than its lead happens to be a woman. Sadly, in 2019 that has become a political statement with factions of the internet going nuts over a movie passing the Bechdel-Wallace test (two women talk to each other about something other than a man.) What it is instead is a fun '90s inspired action comic book movie with some social allegory along with a lot of Marvel fan service.
What the film does well is what Marvel usually does well–great special effects, lots of humor, digital de-aging, post-credit scenes, and plenty of connective tissue to other Marvel films. It also features right out of the gate the best Stan Lee tribute put to film with a cameo still to come! Yet it still can be viewed independently, or even as an entry point to the MCU, its timeline slotting itself rather nicely between CA: The First Avenger and the first Iron Man. There are also more twists in this movie than most any others since The Winter Soldier.
It features two scenes paying homage to (heavily inspired by?) Terminator 2 and Independence Day (which I’m surprised no other review has yet mentioned). Its buddy-road trip vibe in the second act features effortless if not earned chemistry with Brie Larson and Samuel L. Jackson. Clark Gregg’s Phil Coulson is a welcome but underused presence (his digital de-aging not as effective as Nick Fury’s, though 90s pompadour hairstyles were a tad pronounced.) Its comments on the technology of the time are hilarious in hindsight (“What’s happening?” … “It’s loading.”) The soundtrack homage fits though it is not quite as successful as the Guardians of the Galaxy soundtrack. The film score itself, orchestra with some electronic keyboards from the era, did its job during the movie, though as is typical with Marvel, I couldn’t recall its theme once leaving the theater.
Brie Larson is quite good, subtly expressive most of the time, determined and confident, but also witty, smiles, and is capable of one-liners when the situation requires. This despite Jude Law’s character constantly saying she’s too emotional. It’s in the quieter scenes where this pays off–her friendship with fellow Air Force pilot Maria and relationship with Maria’s daughter. Women will recognize the stoic tolerance she exhibits while the men around her put her down or fiddle with tape. The line she delivers to Jude Law at the end fits perfectly, not just for #metoo but in the context of how the Kree have tried to control and re-invent her into “the best version of herself.” But she already is. She doesn’t have a boyfriend, which will anger some, but nor does she have a girlfriend, which may not be enough for those expecting more from Marvel than a big budget movie aimed at the masses.
The movie is set up for her to discover her identity, being left amnesiac from the incident that gave her powers. Unlike Tony Stark, Bruce Banner, Steve Rogers, and Stephen Strange, she doesn’t seek out these powers voluntarily. Nor was she born into them like Thor, Star Lord, or T’Challa. She already has these character strengths, but now she is given super powers on top of that. Learning that she is the master of her own destiny is something that her best friend reminds her of which wakes her from the brainwashing, the Kree standing in for our modern society not just socially, but also politically and militarily.
But it is Ben Mendelssohn’s performance that resonates the most. He’s funny, has a meta moment about his blue eyes and eye glasses, and succeeds in conveying emotion under a pile of makeup and prosthetics. I would almost say he steals the scenes he’s in except that honor goes to the “cat.”
Captain Marvel is a solid Marvel movie. It won’t be the cultural statement to women that Black Panther was for African-Americans. But it may prove to be better than Wonder Woman, and not just financially (sure to surpass WW’s $100M opening.) It sets the table for Endgame nicely and is one of the better hero origin movies Marvel has produced, above Doctor Strange and Spiderman Homecoming, but well short of Black Panther. The fact that so much more expectation is upon this movie shows how far Marvel has come from its beginnings in 2008, but also how much more it can deliver in the coming decade.
Mission: Impossible - Fallout
Won’t do a full review for this one at the moment since it’s late and I would want to see it again before doing so, but just on my initial impressions after having just finished it: WOW.
Brilliant from the jump. Loved the darker, more serious tone the film sets in its opening sequences, aided by some solid cinematography that looks different from what we’ve seen before in the franchise, and the hospital sequence at the beginning was excellent.
This is what Bond should be doing. After Cruise retires from M:I, I’d bring both him and McQuarrie in and have them help guide the Bond franchise for a bit. They started to sneak out in front of Bond with Rogue Nation, but barring a return to Casino Royale form with the next Bond, Fallout has led the M:I franchise out front as the spy franchise to beat as we head into the 2020s.
Beautifully animated, this one is visually stunning and also is an emotional, as well as fun movie.
Despite his family’s baffling generations-old ban on music, Miguel dreams of becoming an accomplished musician like his idol, Ernesto de la Cruz. Desperate to prove his talent, Miguel finds himself in the stunning and colorful Land of the Dead following a mysterious chain of events. Along the way, he meets charming trickster Hector and together, they set off on an extraordinary journey to unlock the real story behind Miguel’s family history.
Triple Frontier (Netflix original)
Men on a mission…
It’s a tricky movie to review because it’s very much a film of two half’s.
The first half begins with the ‘getting the band back together’ trope. But it’s made interesting via the tribulations of life after an army career. It does a good job of this, without getting too preachy and keeping up the pace of the developing plot throughout this examination.
Then we’re in the Men On a Mission section which almost hits a home run. With the characters well established it’s very enjoyable seeing them at work in the jungle and seeing relationships stretch but not break.
The jungle location looks spectacular and one particular scene, shot in torrential rain looks glorious, reminding me, aesthetically of the William Friedkin masterpiece Sorcerer. (If only that infamous final act of SP had been in the rain as intended… ok, it would still be awful, but it would’ve looked a lot better.)
Of course not everything goes to plan, or it’s a short movie. This is where things dramatically shift gear from a heist movie to a survival movie that focuses upon the team’s relationship. And this, for me is where it falls apart.
The relationships are well drawn - it’s functional in terms of the aspects of character the filmmakers obviously want to examine. However it’s a totally different genre to the one you’ve just spent the last hour and a half with. And… at the end of the day this worthy relationship stuff isn’t as good as it thinks it is - ultimately it’s highly predictable tropes, however worthy they try to be. When it’s a men in a mission heist flick those tropes are fine - it’s why you watch such a movie and it illustrates them well. But once the immediate threat is out of the picture and the new threat is the awesome landscapes and one another it’s frankly a little boring.
When this ‘in the wilderness’ section finally ends and the final act ensues with an immediate threat returned it needs to return with a vengeance. It doesn’t! The final act feels more like an episode of The A-Team with a couple of barrel rolling pick up trucks and very little sense of jeopardy.
It seems to have had a decent budget so I can’t see why they couldn’t come up with a far better final act, with high stakes and challenging scenarios for the lads, instead of an A-Team fan movie. It feels like the writer just ran out of ideas. Or maybe they blew the budget on the first half and concerns meant a last minute rewrite to the final act. It’s cheap and without any content whatsoever.
When you look back at the movie there really was very little risk throughout; there’s plenty of foreshadowed risk in the set up, which is great, but it never delivers on it. The boys are far too good at the job and the bad guys too few, too anonymous and too easily dispatched.
In the end I don’t really know what this movie was. I’m guessing that Netflix commissioned an action movie and director JC Chandor signed up for a character driven buddy-survival movie. It ends up as both and yet neither.
It’s a treatise upon the nature of soldiering; how if you’re not careful it can turn you from ‘warrior-patriot’ who kills bad guys into damaged destroyer of anything that gets in your way. This is all within heist action movie trappings. Perhaps in better hands the two could compliment one another, but here they seem to sabotage each other.
A real shame because the cast are excellent; the chemistry really works and they all give a enough detail in their performances for us to believe in them.
Part 1: 9/10 A really enjoyable 80s throwback.
Part 2: 6/10 The pace and genre is as lost as its characters, but the acting and landscape are good.
That final act: 1/10 After given 1hr 45 minutes to this story it’s a lazy slap in the face.
Ps. I’m in a dilemma about whether to rate it ‘thumbs up or ‘down’ on Netflix. The end is so lacklustre that it’s definately a thumbs down movie. But I want Netflix to continue to produce this kind of ambitious stuff with great ensemble casting and exotic location shoots. Giving it the thumbs down surely only contributes to the torrent of factory line YA dirge that Netflix is already flooded with.
Tip: If you can get a copy, then 80s movie High Risk is the ‘men on a mission ripping off a drug lord in the jungle’ movie you should watch (which Triple Frontier totally rips off - only with added boring bits). High Risk stars James Brolin in his Bond casting era, James Coburn and Anthony Quinn and is a whole lot more fun throughout. And The Rolling Stones’ track Satisfaction scores the finally… take that, Triple Frontier!
EDIT: All the edits I’ve done to this review just goes to show how hard I found it to dissect. I look forward to reading someone else’s better attempt.
I first saw him in the Superb film, The Contender.
A US political film with Sam Elliot as Jeff Bridges’ US President’s right hand man.
A film blessed with a stellar cast, lead in part by Gary Oldman’s creepy protagonist. Love it to bits.
The Old Man and The Gun
I really enjoyed this movie. Everything about it is in perfect balance; the script, direction, edit, score and especially the performances.
The score by Daniel Hart is absolutely wonderful, recalling the likes of The Thomas Crown Affair. Set in the early 80s, but about a man already old by then Hart’s score hits the perfect period note. Very Stylish, yet sentimental, just like its protagonist.
David Lowery’s direction holds everything in it’s place. He allows the scenes to take their time, whilst the storytelling never loses it’s kinetic pace. I’m guessing that it’s thanks to his experience as an editor he seems to have known exactly how he wanted to tell this story (as in Cut it). There’s well placed tangents from the mis en scene with montages and graphics which all serve to turn exposition into aesthetic highlights and sometimes joyful in their to-the-point brevity. Like the characters, the story makes the most of it’s time with us.
Last and the furthest thing from least is the cast. There’s Danny Glover and Tom Waits bringing up support with nuance and gravity. Casey Affleck creates yet another absolutely authentic portrait of an everyman; no showboating at all, he always lets the script and story breath. Same goes for Sissy Spacek - as solid as ever.
Redford turns in a truly poignant performance as a simple man who just loves with what he does and when he’s getting to do it he’s the nicest gent to be around and wouldn’t ever hurt a fly. If he does retire from acting after this, then he’s gone out on a high.
Honestly, it’s so good to watch a movie in which no one needs to be a cut-out villain. Everyone in it is essentially a decent person making the best of what life’s presented them.
(It does nothing wrong, but if i give it a 10, what’s left for the likes of Kubrick and Leone)
And for those interested, heres a Q&A with cast and director: