What Movie Have You Seen Today?

The Man Who Haunted Himself (1970)

After seeing Roger tout this for ages as his favorite film and the only time he was allowed to really act, I finally snagged a DVD late last year for a pittance and just now got around to watching it.

It’s an interesting film, unsettling at times and well-paced. It has a “small” feel to it, especially in comparison to the Bonds, but clever camerawork, artful editing and one or two “how did they do that way back then” effects raise it safely out of “made for TV” territory.

Roger really does give his all here and it’s very effective. Much as I love the guy (still my favorite Bond), over his career he often seemed to struggle with scenes that demanded deep emotion, almost as if he was uncomfortable potentially revealing something personal or genuine. At best, he could usually manage the “righteous anger” routine as Templar or Bond, yelling at some baddie, but even then it didn’t always work. Here, however, he manages to sell (for me at least) a portrayal of a man whose life is coming apart at the seams and who’s gradually descending into madness.

One of the best moments (SPOILERS) comes late in the film when what we realize is Roger’s evil self shows up at the office looking self-assured with that patented Roger Moore gleam in eye, as if he knows a joke no one else is in on. It’s pretty much the world-famous “Roger as Bond” persona except here, somehow, it has a disturbing, even frightening effect. The fact that until now we have only seen this character as a colorless automaton or an unraveling neurotic makes the sudden appearance of the cocky, self-assured Roger Moore(tm) unsettling, even though that’s the guy we’re normally most familiar with.

Ultimately the whole affair leaves us with more questions than answers, which historically has not been the recipe for box office success, so I’m not surprised this film remains obscure. I need to watch it again with the wife so we can engage in a debate about what it all means, if anything. But as frustrated as that sort of thing left me in my youth, I have to say it’s kind of refreshing at this stage, when so few films are willing to dare anything beyond what the accountants and focus groups tell them is guaranteed to sell.

It also looks great, considering this was a DVD and not a Blu-Ray.

If there’s any weak point, it’s the music, which is unimpressive at best and downright distracting at worst. There’s a tune that repeats throughout the picture that is treated as somehow meaningful (various characters play it on their turntables in addition to all the scenes where it’s not diegetic) but it’s got a “Pop” vibe that undermines scenes that should have been creepy or suspenseful, while not being “Pop” enough to sell any soundtrack albums. I’d love to see this thing again with a proper score.

Another thing that works against it – through no fault of the filmmakers – is its similarity to an episode of The Persuaders that covered similar ground in a less sombre fashion. Having Roger central to both created a sense of deja vu and with the music added to the confusion of just what I was supposed to be feeling.

Ultimately, I agree it’s probably Roger’s best outing as an actor. It’s interesting to speculate what direction his career might have taken without Bond, but ultimately I’m pretty sure things turned out for the best, all the way around.

2 Likes

She said

Wonderful film about how the NYTimes uncovered Harvey Weinstein‘s reign of gruesome cruelty, perfectly acted, written, shot and directed by Maria Schrader.

This would have deserved the Oscar nomination so many others on that list did not.

But people apparently don’t want to get reminded of what happened. So… AVATAR 2, yay!

3 Likes

Agreed. I sawt it at the New York Film Festival, and thought it was amazing, and am disappointed that it sank so fast (though not surprised). Same thing happened to WOMEN TALKING–a great film that also vanished. But TOP GUN: MAVERICK–there is a phallus we can all get behind.

A small amendment (in case it is not clear): SHE SAID was scripted by Rebecca Lenkiewicz.

4 Likes

THE FABELMANS

A movie which poignantly and still with a light, precise touch, deals with universal themes of growing up, having dreams, obsessions, trying to live within reality and still carve out one‘s personal niche to control what one can control, being outside society, being hated on by certain parts of society, learning to make one’s own way, despite obstacles piling up, despite goodness turning into weakness, and weakness turning into strength.

It is one of Spielberg‘s best movies, and the final shot made me smile and feel so uplifted at the same time.

4 Likes

Skyfall is mentioned.

3 Likes

Weirdly, I feel like giving this film another chance.

Wouldn’t be the first time I was completely wrong due to my mind being occupied with too many things, prohibiting me to appreciate what was in front of me.

Everything everywhere all at once

Okay, I get it now.

My apologies. This is one of those movies I apparently only really get into when I see it for the second time.

Pretty great stuff.

2 Likes

So glad you enjoyed–had an idea/hope you might.

I liked it the first time I saw it, and only truly got into it when I saw it a second time, and realized how intricate it was. I also watched with the subtitles on, which helped a great deal.

1 Like

At first I thought it was just gimmicky, hyper and empty.

I don’t know why I did not immediately pick up on its deep humane take on how the smallest events can make or break you, even if you don’t think they can.

I think my first viewing experience was even proving that point to me. Seemingly small problems in my life diverted my attention during that time, and I should not have sat down to watch this movie or any movie on that day.

It all adds to the theory that one‘s judgement on art depends on what one brings to it.

1 Like

Gimmicky and hyper it is, but, as you have experienced–far from empty. The film is so busy nodding in so many directions at once to so many genres–in addition to having iconic genre actors in major roles–that the audience can become as lost as the characters in the swirl of narrative. We have to work to discover meaning as much as the characters do. I have found that not having to concern myself with the narrative now knowing what happens, I can appreciate the details of the film–where, one could argue, the real action of the film occurs.

It is a theme subtly encased in high-level cinematic mise-en-scene and acting. It was only watching EEAAO for the second time (with subtitles) that I caught the doctor expressing to Evelyn’s father sorrow over his child being a daughter–a statement that means everything, and is everywhere manifest in Evelyn’s life, even though it was uttered when she was only moments old, and would not have understood what was being said.

Exactly.

1 Like

JOHN WICK 4. On screen.

Since I always enjoy reading other members’ posts about genre films that I do not see, and sometimes feel a tad bad that I am always going on about Godard or other arthouse films, I am pleased to say I saw JOHN WICK 4 last evening. The husband had a class to complete on-line, so I needed something to do, and it was playing with open captions, my best friend who knows my taste well said I would enjoy it, and the article linked below noted how the director and cinematographer endeavored to make it look like a movie by Bertolucci and Wong Kar-wai (damn you art house aesthetic!).

The film called to mind Buster Keaton, Sergio Leone, and in a glorious homage/incorporation, Walter Hill’s THE WARRIORS (1979). I looked up the earlier Wick films, and learned that the death of a puppy sets the story in motion, but JW4 is no more concerned with story than are the films of Warren Sonbert or Hollis Frampton. The film is about space; bodies (and cameras) moving in space; painting with color and light; editing; and what can be done with and to the cinematic image.

Just as Keaton used a ship about to be scrapped as the inspiration for THE NAVIGATOR (1924), so the 222 steps leading to Sacré-Cœur in Paris generate cinema. Chad Stahelski unearths the mise en scene latent within these steps and frees it, as Keaton did with the ship of THE NAVIGATOR and the train of THE GENERAL.

Will Keaton get the girl? Yes. Will Wick make it up the stairs? Yes. Neither filmmaker is concerned with the what of the narrative, but rather with the how of it. I know Macbeth (spoiler alert) will not sit on Scotland’s throne for long; yet I return to the play for the beauty of the verse. Tonight I am going to see JW4 again for the poetry of its mise en scene.

3 Likes

Ghosted (Apple +)

I liked the trailer, especially Evans delivering the line „I‘m the boyfriend!“

But the trailer is more entertaining than the movie. It really feels as if it was written by AI, and it probably was cobbled together by focus group results and algorithms finding out when users signed off or kept watching.

Ana de Armas is an appealing actress, but NTTD used her character for just the right amount of time. Stretched for a whole film length, she is just another beautiful woman with guns.

Evans can be funny (thanks to Rian Johnson), but here he is miscast because who believes that his bodybuilt dreamboat appearance has trouble attracting women? Yeah, yeah, I know why he really was cast. But that already is the problem of this uninvolving greatest hits mix of CGI-Action and overused comedy bits.

It is just middle of the road, no ambitions, background fodder for an audience which is at the same time busy with their phones.

3 Likes

I enjoyed it. I don’t think I’ll remember that I’ve seen it by Tuesday, but it was fun while I watched it. It’s the bag of crisps of movies.

But is that what movies should do? Especially with that budget?

They have become what pop songs these days too often are - disposable time wasters, nobody will remember them.

1 Like

Oh god no!

It’s a weird place we’re in that the more money spent on a film or song the more disposable the final piece is.

2 Likes

Inspired by the WGA strike, I’m probably going to watch QOS later. A film that is much better than it should be given the circumstances in which it was made.

2 Likes

It has one of the most tense sequences in any Bond film (or any thriller) - „Make it count“…

2 Likes

Knock at the cabin

And at the beginning of the year I was ready to welcome Shyamalan back into my „favourite directors“-group…

Then the lackluster and confused ending of „Servant“ irritated me.

And now this adaptation of Paul Tremblay‘s novel „The Cabin at the end of the world“ again hugely disappoints me.

Shyamalan uses the premise but completely changes what the book is about…

Summary

… by refusing to follow Tremblay‘s horror of the couple deciding not to sacrifice anyone. Instead Shyamalan turns the story into everything a conspiracy nut would love: „My vision was the truth!“. Horrible.

A totally missed opportunity.

An old fav that popped up on my movie feed. “Hannie Caulder” with the (sadly gone from us) great Miss Raquel Welch. Epic, good fun. Robert Culp is excellent and Christopher Lee as well. If you haven’t, you should.

3 Likes

I love Hannie Caulder. I also own the UK edition of the movie tie-in novel that was released.

1 Like