Twenty-two years I have been haunting this website, or earlier iterations of it, and in those years I’ve seen many things stated that, were I in the mood, would cause me to gnaw my own face off.
Thought we might run another month-long game, a bit like the ones in December 2021 and April 2022. The statements below, which I have seen posted hereabouts on the wasteland over the years, are perhaps a little baity, a touch negative perhaps, and assertions rather than questions. I can’t say I agree with them all honestly, but might pose that I do. Several I vehemently disagree with.
All of them interest me, though. How about you?
First batch below; more to come.
April 1: Dr No was the wrong film to start a series with. As with the book, it depicts Bond more as a general investigator than as an elimination agent with a licence to kill.
April 2: Given that it has Bond subjugated to a wartime enemy, with WW2 recent memory for his readers, had You Only Live Twice been set in the then West Germany, it wouldn’t have been published.
April 3: :Less is more; the offshoots such as Young Bond, the 007 Store, 007 Road to a Million, basically harm it and they really shouldn’t bother. Occasional film, occasional adult Bond Book; that’s enough. The “brand” is strong enough without all this… tat.
April 4: Removing some if not all of the racially suspect commentary and comments from the Bond novels will only serve to emphasise the currently questionable material that then remains, and must therefore backfire.
April 5: Killing Bond at the end of No Time to Die sensibly draws a line under that era, and all its callbacks to earlier eras, leaving Eon totally free to clean-slate things. Although they won’t.
April 6: Given his propensity for (ahem) “borrowing” material from other sources, “Going back to Fleming” means copying the styles of others and other genres; accordingly, in spirit the most Fleming-like period of the films (post the notionally direct adaptations) was the 1970s.