Saw this on the BBC news site earlier
Which novel mentioned the tunnels exactly?
Saw this on the BBC news site earlier
Which novel mentioned the tunnels exactly?
Sorry, beats me. I thought I knew Casino Royale by heart. Donât remember any mention of Holborn/Kingsway tunnels.
Thanks for confirming, the only time I can remember tunnels in London being mentioned was in the novelisation of D.A.D, when Bond meets M and Q at the fictional disused vauxhall cross tube station.
The article says âfeatured in the first James Bond novelâ so I fired up Casino Royale on my Kindle app and did searches for the words âKingsway,â âHolborn,â and âtunnelâ and it came up with nothingâŠ
I wonder if that could be Dr. No? Mixing up novel and film perhaps? But I also donât remember any mention of London tunnels in that one. Havenât the foggiest what exactly they meanâŠ
This article mentions it too!
As does this one
This article states it is in the Casino royale novel!
The Kingsway Tunnels run 40 metres under High Holborn, below Chancery Lane Tube station. They cover about 7,000 square metres and were used to shelter Londoners during the Blitz in WWII, before being utilised as a telecommunications centre for the Special Operations Executive (SOE). 007 creator Ian Fleming referenced these very same tunnels in his first Bond book âCasino Royaleâ in 1953 â as Fleming was a liaison officer to the SOE at the time.
Only thing I can think of is itâs maybe mentioned in the original manuscript but was cut from the published text. Otherwise I wouldnât know.
Mind you, for the longest time Fleming didnât mention SIS/MI6. To the best of my knowledge he never mentioned SOE, Enigma/Bletchley Park/GC&CS for very practical reasons*: he was bound by the Official Secrets Act to keep his trap shut.
Therefore it seems likely Fleming might have had second thoughts - or have received a tap on the shoulder - about mentioning a probably top secret installation less than ten years after the war. An installation that possibly was kept secret until the 70s or even later.
*Likewise did many other spy writers who were in some way or form involved in wartime intelligence. They came up with euphemisms and nicknames like âBureauâ âDepartmentâ âCircusâ and the like. And some of the wartime spies and commandos were extremely cross with Fleming, the bureaucrat, for cashing in on their experiences - while they themselves werenât allowed to talk about it.
There are tunnels in Higsons Young Bond, Double or Die, IIRC.
I looked further into it and found âthe tunnels are referenced by Ian Fleming in his first James Bond book Casino Royale as the location of Mâs Q Branch laboratories.â
I did another Kindle search for words like âquartermasterâ and âbranchâ and still come up with nothing.
Iâm stubborn enough to re-read the damn book until I settle this
I just re-read the M scenes in CR (there arenât many) and while he does tell Bond to see Q about any equipment he needs there is no mention of a locationâŠ
Iâm so sorry if I have sent you on a wild goose chase!
I wish journalists would get their facts straight before publishing articles!
Did the same. The way I remember Q branch in Flemingâs first books they seem to be more of a travel documents/cover provider than the trick department weâve come to expect after From Russia, with Loveâs attachĂ© case. At any rate I never pictured their location anywhere else than in the HQ basement itself.
Really canât think of any London tunnels in Flemingâs Ćuvre.
The official government website for this project mentions the Bond connection, so journalists are not in the wrong by reporting it.
In that case itâs likely this is what happened.
You had a good point though, Dustin, when you mentioned the Official Secrets Act. If this was covered under that how could Fleming have mentioned it!?
Fleming stays somewhat opaque with his fantasy Secret Service and its machinations - but most of his work is heavily influenced by the war. One might say Bondâs adventures are a fantasy continuation of that time. Hugo Draxâ fond memories of wartime exploits and adventures were certainly shared by Fleming.
Those in-the-know would probably have raised an eyebrow about the contents. But since Fleming avoided outright disclosure he wasnât charged. Graham Greene spilled some beans in Our Man in Havanna and there was some stink about it afterwards in 1958. I would assume Fleming let someone inside the apparatus proofread his stuff. Or perhaps he simply thought better of it and cut sensitive parts himself.
Owing to the fact that I had planned on re-reading all the Flemingâs this summer, I just finished Casino Royale and can report that there is zero mention of any tunnelsâŠ