NO TIME TO DIE Spoilers (production pictures & videos)

#4259

Nope…

#4260

Yes.

No

Maybe.

You can’t give a declarative answer to a subjective medium.

THEY DESTROYED MY CHILDHOOD BY BEING WOKE NEVERTRUMPERS!!!

What’s a Bond film?

Choose whichever you like.

#4261

Ive started to see a bit of criticism of Bond is a man from BB on twitter etc… which is unsurprising but in general pretty unfair - I think BB is on a thin line between evolution and tradition and so far is hitting the mark for the most part - and of course producing films like The Rhythm Section and Film Stars Don’t Die In Liverpool separate to Bond (and spearheading the failed Jynx spin off) - I think MGW and BB saying Bond can be any colour and pointing to the diversity of Britain and the Commonwealth was a good sign.

1 Like
#4262

Nope.

They can go In to the fray energised and full of hope.

But they are allowed to be tired at the end of it. As anyone would be.

2 Likes
#4263

Here’s one to take with a grain of salt of course but…Universal Pictures Russia is giving exhibitors an estimated runtime of…174 minutes

3 Likes
#4264

A bloody big grain.

1 Like
#4265
1 Like
#4266

I hope not. Hard to imagine it being tight at that length. Also my bladder is not as young as it used to be.:disappointed:

3 Likes
#4267

Lol, that’s my sole reason for waiting to watch the longer movies (I’m looking at you Tarantino) at home.

Bring back the intermission :persevere:

#4268

2 hours 54 minutes? For the last ever Craig film I wouldn’t be complaining. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s shorter than that, but for me, the longer the better. Lots of juicy material they could explore with some of these themes.

#4269

It would all certainly explain the clapperboards with scene numbers almost at 250…

#4270

Perhaps the first cut came in at 174 minutes. I just don’t see the distributors agreeing to that length. But, what do I know?

1 Like
#4271

I doubt it’ll be that long, but who knows? The Avengers films certainly did quite a bit to mainstream super long movies. And Avengers: Endgame certainly doesn’t feel 3 hours long. I wouldn’t mind more Craig Bond especially if it’s his last.

#4272

Well, if Disney let Endgame be 3 hours…and just later this year, 170 for It Chapter 2 from WB…

Remember that the distributors basically do what EON wants, and if EON wants three hours they’ll get it.

#4273

I doubt there is a run time this far in advance. Aren’t they still editing?

#4274

Sure. But then they ought to have a target corridor where they expect to end up in. But this long is really stretching it, I should think.

#4275

Marvel fans probably tend to be a bit younger, with stronger bladders.

For a predominantly young audience, or a prestige movie maybe, but for a franchise like Bond, now we’ll used to looking forward to big returns I just don’t see it coming in at 3 hrs.

More’s the pity!

#4276

Spectre was 2h40m, Skyfall was 2h20 - doesnt seem like a huge change or leap to me as an estimate - I’d expect NTTD to be about the same

1 Like
#4277

SP was actually 2h28m (I also found the erroneous 2h40m on Google), so almost another half hour is definitely a leap.

1 Like
#4278

Wow!

I am a huge Marr / Smiths fan, so obviously I’m delighted at this news, although I suspect many on here (mainly non-UK) might not be too familiar with him.

6 Likes