Great find, thanks for sharing!
Does anyone else think that the hockey scene in FYEO was a super dumb moment in an otherwise great film? An “own goal” if there ever was one. See what I did there?
1 Like
Having dabbled in ice skating I found the general idea to have these huge and hugely padded figures with their sticks quite intimidating. There are some tough moments for Moore’s Bond in that fight - disposing of these guys single-handedly and in the funny goal fashion was what killed that scene.
I liked that Bond didn’t draw his gun or kill the guys in another way. But it’s mysterious what their actual purpose was. I only can think of Kristatos paying a bunch of regular ice hockey players to roughen up any lurkers around the child he’s grooming. But outside in the Lotus there’s Bond’s contact being killed by Locque, so it’s probably his men too in the ice rink. If so, it’s counterproductive to engage Bond since Kristatos needs Bond to kill Columbo; and for that task Bond should be in decent shape.
If these hockey players were Kriegler’s KGB underlings they’d certainly haven’t bothered with the ice hockey gear and just have opened fire on Bond.
So it’s really a bit pointless as a move for both of Bond’s adversaries. And the comic relief was quite awkward and mainly there to show the Longines branding.
2 Likes
It are Kristatos’ men, one of them, probably the leader, is the guy played by Charles Dance.
2 Likes
I always thought them, the black clad motorcycle guys and the Mercedes crew, to be KGB hoods from the way Kriegler orders them around - but thinking about it there seems to be no clear designation other than they all apparently answering to Locque.
Except for Kriegler, who his perhaps more a semi-cover observer for Kristatos’ efforts? It’s all a bit murky, in spite of me having rewatched the film only some months ago.
2 Likes
This dynamic occurs in many Bond films, I think: bad guys behaving non-sensically.
These days, I conclude, that’s just very realistic.
4 Likes
But then again we’ve had that in Gardner’s continuations of the 80s too: Licence Renewed’s Murik trying to extort governments to build his own design of nuclear plant with the money; For Special Services’ Spectre doing various attempts on Bond while their head wants him brainwashed for the Cheyenne Mountain raid; Icebreaker’s attempts on Bond although he’s supposed to be handed over to the KGB…the examples are countless and usually quite schizophrenic.
In Bond’s world things don’t necessarily happen according to reason and cause and effect. They tend to follow more a continuously escalating gravity towards a well of outrageousness.
5 Likes
Perhaps you are referencing henchmen continuing to pursue Bond after their boss and his plan have been defeated?
A sentiment that every Bond fan should have embroidered on a throw pillow.
Another classic Dustin neologism!
EON tool kit meet well of outrageousness.
3 Likes
Oh, I think they just love their job and wanted to impress future employers (Drax) with their thoroughness. „Choose Kidd and Wint, they follow through even if you can‘t anymore!“
4 Likes
Blofeld may be dead (or not), Bond didn’t bring down SPECTRE entirely, and the organization surely wants revenge. Also, they’re dedicated professionals who always finish what they started, very much like Winston Wolf, Anton Chigurh, or the late great Dr. Kaufmann. Unlike killers like Red Grant or Xenia Onatopp, who get a kick out of the killing. And it could also be that they took their initial defeat just a little bit personal… 
5 Likes
&
I hope these thoughts–with which I agree–are remembered during the next Henchperson Deathmatch. Love of job, professionalism, and thoroughness deserve recognition and support.
4 Likes
Slightly out of context, there’s a German tear-off calendar for 2025, with a Bond themed illustration for each day. Some are better, some are worse, but with 365 of them, you just can’t win them all.
Thought you might like this one…
Shameless plug for a friend:
https://amzn.eu/d/cAiqgLf
10 Likes
Here’s an interesting artifact for Moore fans; a 1974 appearance on Burt Bacharach’s variety show (which I didn’t even know was a thing) in which Roger tackles the timely issue of Women’s Lib, then goes into disguise(s) to sing a duet with himself. Oh, YouTube, is there anything you can’t do?
4 Likes
And he‘s doing it marvelously!
1 Like
Fab skit, fab duet!
Some people just have natural charisma and likability. Roger was one of those.
4 Likes
Yes, I know he dropped out of that stage production over his insecurities about his singing voice, and that he resorted to a talk-sing Rex Harrison routine for his “Muppets” appearance, but I think he sounds great. Maybe he just needed the “security blanket” of a character disguise.
BTW in 1974, at age 8, I received my first non-toy turntable and with it a BJ Thomas album that was headlined by “Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head,” which was subsequently played hundreds of times and became the first song to which I learned all the lyrics. So if I’d seen this at the time, I’d have gone nuts.
4 Likes
I have actually a vinyl single from Roger singing, but I don’t know right now where I have kept it.
It’s this one:
1 Like