Because Bond is known for sex scenes?
Common practice these days, every production hires them to provide safety for actresses.
This is true, in fact I know that Bond had this as standard practice back in 2002. Rosamund Pike has talked about the lengths Bb went to ensure the safety and comfort of the actresses under her charge.
Who is this āSunā source, when did it become normal practice for ājournalistsā to quote unsubstantiated sources from rival newspapersā¦ ( Iām not really asking itās more of a rant )
Intimacy coordinaters have been, as is said, in place since at least 2002. This sort of reporting is very frustrating.
I would just like to pause to say, Ana de Armas is beautiful.
Madeleine could be out of the picture by then? Or perhaps Bond is being unfaithful? Either option would be fine with me. Bond isnāt a role model, but a cold hearted bastard.
I think sheās out of the picture - something puts Spectre back on the map so he seeks her out.
Maybe this should have been posted in the spoilers thread? Iāve been trying to avoid spoilers since the start of filming, and I had assumed Madeline was to continue as Bondās love interest. Now Iām left here to speculate about her fateā¦ (for those who may know, please do not spoil the movie for those of us who have been careful to avoid the spoilers thread)
We dont know either. Just speculations.
As Orion said, we genuinely have zero idea. Pure speculation and was framed as such. Nobody knows anything concrete other than the released synopsis.
Yep, thatās fine as long as the spoilers section doesnāt spill into this thread.
Just a quick thought: I never got the problem with āspoilersā. Knowing something that will happen in a film I want to watch will not spoil anything for me.
As a kid I was eager to see āThe Empire Strikes Backā. A neighbor saw it first and told me what happened. I still couldnāt wait to see it and enjoyed it nevertheless. As an adult I read what happened at the ending of āThe Sixth Senseā. Cool, I thought, went to see it and enjoyed it nevertheless.
Well everyoneās different. But I love knowing absolutely nothing about a movie before watching it and having my mind blown, if possible.
I can understand both approaches. Being the age that I am I was used to having much less information in advance when seeing a film. Today of course many people want to follow the production in detail, soaking up everything - while others prefer to stay as clean as possible.
CBn tries to offer both camps the opportunity to take part within their respective threads. But there simply is no guarantee a speculative idea like āX shoots Zā will definitely, never, in no feasible way turn out to be true in the finished product. When you canāt predict whatās going to happen itās just as impossible to predict whatās not going to happen.
I agree this is frustrating for some of those wanting to remain un-spoilered - but the only alternative would be to completely withdraw from discussion until youāve seen the film. I know of people who do that; well, if it works for them I wonāt argue. But most fans simply donāt command such a level of discipline.
Spoilers are vile, evil and a special place in hell awaits those whom spoil on purpose
Havenāt noticed any here, though, since Iām assuming no one here is in the loopā¦
Bond takes down the main villain at the end of the filmā¦
Arhhhh! Youāve ruined it for me now!!!
James Bond flirts with at least one of women featured in the film.
Also Naomie Harris plays a character called Eve Moneypenny.
Bond takes orders from some guy named M.