Kind of agree with that sentiment. I hate how Spectre played out, but now you’ve got to own it.
More the second option. I’d probably give it a very loose connection the rest of the saga, much as every previous Bond actor, until Craig, had their Bond loosely connected to the overall story. Though the DB5 in Skyfall, more than anything, really throws any semblance of a coherent timeline out the window.
Since the choices are “NO” and “NO,” I’ll say " NO. "
In LALD, Bond is told he’s “goin’ skydiving” (sans parachute), but he avoids it. In MR, he really does do it. So…
Would the skydiving fight sequence have been more effective in the context of LALD (where if nothing else it’d be a more excusable way to abandon Solitaire)
OR
Does it work better right where it is, kicking off the OTT spectacle that is MR?
Extended cameo. She’s the weakest Craig-era Bond girl, which is strange because she’s an important character played by a very talented actress. However, for the story I think she has to die and die early.
Will Bond 25 play out as:
A You Only Live Twice-ish adaptation
OR
A different Spectre story
?
A You Only Live Twice-ish adaptation (fingers crossed!)
In Bond 26, Bond 7 is introduced via the opening of TMWTGG (novel); a direct sequel to YOLT in which a brainwashed Bond tries to assassinate M. Then he’s rehabilitated, allowing for the new Bond actor to establish his Bond by re-learning who he is.
Or
Bond 7 is introduced afresh, with no ties to the Craig canon.
(Oops! Guess that’s what I get for not proofreading my answer properly… )
And to answer theSpectre’s question:
YES Bond 25 will make it’s Valentine’s Day release.
Now that the ball is rolling along with Bond 25, should EON start thinking ahead now as to who the next 007 will be and what sort of storyline should it be so that what we won’t have such a long wait in between films? YES or NO (let them fully concentrate on making Bond 25 as good as possible)?
No. Let them focus on Bond 25, planning for a film when you don’t know where the money is coming from, when you’ll be making it or any other consequence, good or bad, from how Bond 25 does, makes such planning a fools errand.
Two auteurs in a row now -
should Eon stick with that for the series going forward?
Or
Should they have a single go to director, much like they have on stand-by for the other positions in the crew?
Property of a Lady, supposedly it was going to be used as the title for Dalton’s third.
If, in a surprise move, vesper actually survived the ending of Casino Royale and returns in Bond 25, would it be:
Great, the best Bond lady and Bond finally gets the chance to save her and relieve his guilt
OR
Enough rewriting Fleming, it would be as bad or worse than Bond and Blofeld being brothers
?
Telly Savalas in drag would have been something to behold.
I say Rathbone
Most gratuitous dinner jacket scene
Connery in DAF
Or
Moore eating soup in AVTAK